Hi Roger,
It appears, from the screen capture that you posted, you are using a cell phone and your email app to participate in the INA Google group. A choice that is different than some of the other group participants. I feel your pain and respect your tolerance for the poor user interface via email complicated by the small screen of a cell phone.
A new platform that offers a dedicated mobile app would improve your specific user experience and would probably be worth an extra $10 a year added to the membership fee, given your choice of device. Folks like me would be indifferent to the change in platform but would pay the higher membership fee in support of the fleet and the volunteers who donate their time and talent.
I prefer to browse the group with my laptop using the URL https://groups.google.com/g/INA-Nonsuch-Discussion-Group. I find the user interface satisfactory, and consistent with my expectations of something that is free and isn’t polluted with advertising and spam. I don’t have trouble posting video or images because I share links to my content via either google drive or dropbox.
I receive email notifications when new content is posted, but I don’t reply from my email client ( although gmail seems to do a decent job formatting the reply unlike some email clients ). Instead of replying from within the email, I click a link ( in each email ) to navigate to the group which opens in a separate browser window and deep links to the post referenced by the email.
Yes I make lots of accommodations to stay happy with this tired old tool called Google Groups… which reminds me of some of the old tools in my shop. When they break I’ll replace them but I gotta tell you some of the new tools I’ve bought lately are expensive and pure crap compared to the old ones.
Given how I choose to use the group, my inclination is to invest any available $ or volunteer hours to improve the curated information on the website.
Curated content is an important way to preserve knowledge that will be eventually lost if it is only preserved by word of mouth and or forum discussions.
If INA decides to pay for better collaboration tools and raises membership fees to pay the license fees, I hope we provide complementary memberships for our top 25 contributors ( selected by quality of posts not quantity ).
For me, the tool is less relevant than the content. As a new owner I truly appreciate the groups key contributors.
Happy Holiday and Soave sia il vento,
Rob Cohen
s/v SOAVE
NS33 #009
Westport, CT